skip to main content


Search for: All records

Creators/Authors contains: "Petitjean, P."

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. ABSTRACT

    We study the time variability (over ≤7.3 yr) of ultra fast outflows (UFOs) detected in a sample of 64 C iv broad absorption line (BAL) quasars (with 80 distinct BAL components) monitored using the Southern African Large Telescope. By comparing the properties of the quasar in our sample with those of a control sample of non-BAL quasars, we show that the distributions of black hole mass are different and the bolometric luminosities and optical photometric variations of UFO BAL quasars are slightly smaller compared to that of non-BAL quasars. The detection fraction of C iv equivalent width (W) variability (∼95 per cent), the fractional variability amplitude $\left(\frac{\Delta W}{W}\right)$ and the fraction of ‘highly variable’ BAL (i.e. $\big|$$\frac{\Delta W}{W}$$\big|$ > 0.67) components (∼33 per cent) are higher in our sample compared to the general BAL population. The scatter in $\frac{\Delta W}{W}$ and the fraction of ‘highly variable’ BALs increase with the time-scale probed. The $\frac{\Delta W}{W}$ distribution is asymmetric at large time scales. We attribute this to the BAL strengthening time-scales being shorter than the weakening time-scales. The BAL variability amplitude correlates strongly with the BAL properties compared to the quasar properties. BALs with low W, high-velocity, shallow profiles, and low-velocity width tend to show more variability. When multiple BAL components are present, a correlated variability is seen between low- and high-velocity components with the latter showing a larger amplitude variations. We find an anticorrelation between the fractional variations in the continuum flux and W. While this suggests photoionization induced variability, the scatter in continuum flux is much smaller than that of W.

     
    more » « less
  2. null (Ed.)